|
|
Op-Ed: Insanity of the Diamond Industry
Aug 12, 2015 5:23 AM
By Neil Reiff
|
|
|
RAPAPORT... Veteran Philadelphia, Pennsylvania jeweler Neil Reiff last month published the following commentary on LinkedIn. With “Insanity of the Diamond Industry”, the president of N.D. Reiff Company Ltd. raises a number of compelling concerns and questions for our industry. The article is reposted here with Reiff's permission.
It has been stated repeatedly that the cost of rough diamonds is too high with the result being lack of profitability in the diamond industry. It is my position, as one who has spent a lifetime in the trade, that it is the retail pricing of diamonds that is too low.
Diamonds are not an "elastic commodity" of which demand increases with increased supply or lower price. Diamonds are not a disposable or consumable product that someone needs to buy repeatedly. The purchase of a diamond is, to many, a once-in-a -lifetime event. A lower price will not stimulate more diamond sales. At best, a lower price simply saves the consumer money or increases the carat weight of his purchase.
As a former business student at a well-regarded University, I learned that the purpose of a business enterprise is the creation of profits. Profit is essential to the success of any business enterprise for without it and the positive cash flow that it creates, a business model is not sustainable. Profit is the excess of revenues minus the cost of goods sold and the many other expenses that are incurred in operating the business enterprise.
Gross profit is the measure of revenues in excess of cost of goods sold. It is from this excess of revenue minus CGS that profit flows to the bottom line. It has been said by many astute business people that gross profit margin is the key to assessing the financial health and future of any business. With few exceptions (ie, Amazon.com), revenue growth is meaningless if the business model does not generate positive cash flows. Such a business is not sustainable over time.
I had a recent encounter in business that led me to author this discussion. The situation was this:
A wholesale customer was attempting to sell a 3-carat PSH diamond to a long-time valued retail client with whom he has established a professional and trusting relationship. He quoted a fair retail price to the client who was excited at the prospect of having a beautiful new diamond for his wife of many years. The wholesale customer/retailer was astounded when his customer telephoned him to tell him that he could buy the same diamond for less money on the Internet.
I cannot say how much less because I do not know the retail price that my customer quoted. I do know that the Internet seller was quoting a price of $24,996.00 for the same diamond that I own and am wholesaling for $24,575.00! This represents a gross profit of $421.00 on a $25,000.00 diamond - a gross profit margin of less than 1.7%!
To this, my customer and I both said, “This is Insanity! . . What is the point?”. There is no point and no purpose in selling anything at a profit margin of 1.7% over cost. No matter how efficiently one may run a business. No matter how much one may grow revenues.
There are a multitude of possible outcomes to this story. Perhaps the customer will now abandon his desire to purchase a diamond for his wife as his perceived value of a diamond has been destroyed as well as the trust he had placed in the seller. Perhaps he just walks away from the transaction because he has a bad taste about the whole thing and it's best to just turn away from it.
Or perhaps he ultimately buys it for the price of $24,996.00. In this case, the buyer has purchased a valuable diamond for 1.7% above the wholesale cost! In this case, it is the industry that has lost. No one has made a profit, as 1.7% cannot be considered to be a profit. More significantly, no additional sales have been made that would not have otherwise been made. In the end, thousands of dollars have been lost - in profits and in value to the industry and to the consumer public - for the perceived value of the billions of dollars of diamonds held by the public and by the industry has been greatly diminished.
With regard to the issue of profitability of the industry and the effect of "high" rough prices, the above story demonstrates that there are players in our industry that are willing to negate profitability within the industry at any price level. If the price of rough was to drop and, subsequently the price of polished diamonds was to drop as well, these industry players would still find it necessary to make diamonds available to the public at the same ridiculous and unsustainable gross margin levels. Lower wholesale diamond prices will simply lead to lower retail prices – in essence, a Catch-22 situation.
Tiffany and Co. and Signet Corporation are two examples of success within our industry. They both sell several billions of dollars of diamonds and jewelry to the consuming public. Both of these companies understand that profits are essential to their ongoing enterprises. Both of these companies are extremely successful. Their revenues and gross profits continue to rise despite the fact that others seem to believe that the only way to conduct business is by selling diamonds at cost - or perhaps 1% or 2% above!
Tiffany and Co. recorded annual sales for 2014 of $4.249,913,000 - a 5% increase over the prior year. Tiffany achieved this sales figure with a gross margin of 64.3%! Tiffany’s markup on cost was 280 percent! To put this into perspective, Tiffany realized a sale price of $28,000.00 on $10,000.00 of cost whereas the Internet retailer above would have realized a sale price of $10,170.00 on the same hypothetical item!
Signet Corporation, the parent of Kay, Jared and Zales, reported 2015 annual sales of $5,736,300,000 in their last fiscal year. Sales at Signet increased by 36%.1 Signet amassed this revenue figure with a gross margin of 36.2% - a markup over cost of more than 156 percent!
It is interesting to note that in Signet's 2015 Annual Report, there is this quote that is highlighted: "Our research consistently tells us the main reason people buy jewelry where they do is NOT PRICE . . . but TRUST" (caps added for emphasis).
This affirms what a friend once told me about why her family purchases jewelry from Tiffany. She explained that she knows she is getting quality and, though the price may be high, she is getting the same price that everyone else receives. Again, a matter of trust!
I made reference to Amazon.com earlier in this discussion. I assume that many of the Internet diamond sellers attempt to rationalize their non-profitable selling by giving themselves too much credit and comparing their endeavor with that of Amazon.com. These Internet sellers have the mistaken belief that someday they will achieve enough revenue growth to become profitable.
This is a fallacy. To begin with, Amazon achieved sales revenues of $88,988,000,000 in 2014. Amazon's sales are more than the entire jewelry industry. Amazon does more business in two days than Blue Nile in one year! More significantly, Amazon continues to grow at 20% per year whereas Blue Nile had sales growth of 5% in their latest fiscal year.
Amazon, unlike the online diamond retailer, sells consumable products that people buy repeatedly. Many Amazon shoppers make hundreds of purchases - every year. Unlike Amazon's customers who will continue to purchase it's products for many years, Internet diamond customers will never become multiple-repeat customers.
More significantly, Amazon had a gross profit of $26,236,000,000 - a gross margin of 29.5%! This equates to a mark-up of nearly 40 percent compared to the Internet diamond company at 1.7 %! To put it simply, Amazon's markup is more than 23 1/2 times that of the Internet diamond retailer who wants to flatter himself in thinking he is following the Amazon model.
So where does this bring us.
There is no doubt that our industry is in a state of disarray. Many, myself included, might say we are in a state of destruction. We are. I would say it's going to get worse but I cannot imagine getting worse than where we are – except for the prospect of retailing diamonds below their wholesale cost. We, as an industry, have destroyed profitability. More significantly, we have destroyed the perceived value of a diamond.
An artist understands that his work is more valuable than simply the price of the canvas and the cost of paint. A doctor understands that his services cannot be given away to the patient for free if he is to support himself and his family. An appliance dealer would never consider selling $10,000.00 of home appliances for $10,170.00. A home builder understands that he cannot build houses and sell them at cost. A diamond retailer who thinks he is succeeding when selling diamonds at a 1.7% markup to the consuming public is only fooling himself as he surely heads into future bankruptcy!
There is little doubt that the Rapaport Price list was the first step in the downward spiral of our industry. I wrote of this in 1998. (See JCK- July 1998 "Martin Rapaport - One Man's Destruction of an Industry"). Today, it is not the wholesale price list that is the problem but the ability of desperate and senseless Internet sellers to upload wholesale diamond database information to consumers at wholesale pricing.
It is the mistaken belief among those in our industry that price is all that matters that will destroy our industry. Increasing one’s revenues without making a profit is a pointless endeavor that leads nowhere. Selling diamonds to the consumer public at wholesale pricing accomplishes nothing except lowering the value of diamonds. The end result of this price-cutting actually diminishes the revenues of the industry as a whole.
An old timer in our industry told me of the advice he received from his earlier generations upon coming into the diamond business. The advice was: "Protect the Inventory". Rolex, - unlike Seiko, which has been discounted into oblivion - understands this premise and has been masterful at upholding value by restricting Internet pricing and discounting.
As a result of my recent encounter with the 3-carat PSH diamond discussed above, I have changed my business practices. No longer will I permit my diamond listings to be indiscriminately downloaded to anyone who wishes to post my diamonds on their website. I am willing to give up these sales by unscrupulous and unprincipled Internet retailers. I believe that my diamonds have value. I believe it is necessary to forego sales to those who want to destroy this value.
I urge other wholesalers to do the same. Forbid others from indiscriminately uploading your diamonds to their retail websites at senseless retail prices - for their senseless prices affects the survival of your well-intentioned customers and the industry. This is necessary in order to stop the race to the bottom and the extinction of the diamond industry. It is simply a matter of one check box in your Rapnet account settings.2
Protect your diamonds. Do business the old fashioned way. Care about whom you choose to do business with. Utilize your relationships. Re-establish trust and value in diamonds.
Notes:
1. Signet Corp sales revenues for fiscal 2015 includes results of Zales acquisition. Sales growth was 6% in fiscal 2013 and 5% in fiscal 2014.
2. It is also possible to allow or deny specific companies within Listings Policy. To manage Listings Policy, Rapnet> Home> My Account> Listings Policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tags:
diamond dream, diamond illusion, N.D. Reiff Company, Neil Reiff, polished prices, RapNet, Tiffany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 17, 2015 1:36AM
By Benjamin Kelaty
|
|
Mr. Reiff makes a great point in a well-written article. To sell diamonds at almost no profit does not make sense! Diamonds are not an article people buy constantly. Reducing prices does not make someone buy more quantity than they would normally do (like a chocolate bar, hamburger, or clothing on sale in a department store). Thus, slashing the profits and prices have shrunk the whole "pie" of our industry in general.
I would like to hear the opinion of an internet diamond company who does actually works on thin profits... What is their strategy and reasoning?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 13, 2015 8:31PM
By Brent Sutcliffe
|
|
Neil makes so many valid points. Saying that branding will solve this problem is far too simplistic, and this is evidenced by the fact that internet sales of very cheap diamonds are very very high. People arent buying by brand, they buy from the person with the cheapest price. The romance and mystery of diamonds has been taken by the diamond industry, and replaced by buying off a paper report, for the person prepared to make the least money. Its crazy!! Business is not about who can make the least money.
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNET-DIAMONDS SALE TO A NEW LOW
|
|
Aug 13, 2015 5:13PM
By ALAN PAUL
|
|
MDM,
It is the ignorance and shortsightedness of people of people in our industry that have put the diamond industry where it is today.
Your response to Mr Reiff seems to be as insane as the insanity that he wrote about. This may be a new world and maybe you believe that you are the only one who gets it, but selling diamonds for NO PROFIT does not make sense...further more I know as a fact that people in our industry feel the same way as I do.
How many others out there in the diamonds industry feel the same?
I'd like to here other opinions from both sides of the fence, wholesalers to retailers.
I'VE BEEN A DIAMOND BROKER FOR OVER 35 YEARS...and
THE LONGER I STAY IN BUSINESS THE BROKER I GET!
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNET DIAMOND SALES HIT AN ALL TIME LOW
|
|
Aug 13, 2015 2:30PM
By Alan Paul
|
|
It's a shame so many people in our industry are so ignorant...your missing the big picture. YOUR REPLY MAKES NO SENSE, and it's as insane as the author points out in his article.
If you don't agree, please explain, Mr, Reiff was correct in his assumption, and you were incorrect.
I for one would like to hear more on this issue, from others in our industry.
Manufactures, vendors, wholesalers, and retailers, from both sides of this fence.
|
|
|
|
|
Optional
|
|
Aug 13, 2015 2:45AM
By V K
|
|
Excellent insight and absolutely true. Hope sense prevails in our industry!
|
|
|
|
|
New Era, New Way of doing business as well in Diamond Industry
|
|
Aug 12, 2015 2:08PM
By Milenial Diamond Manufacter
|
|
I totally disagree with Reiff!
He is completly avoiding and denying the technology that changed our lives and its here forever.
You cant just say "Do business the old fashioned way".
In Old Fashioned days there was no Rapnet=transperacy, the clinet had no tools to compare prices, you can't just avoid that any inteligent consumer of every product is and will take his smartphone and will compare your asking price with your competitors as well in diamonds. If you are not offering your clined somthing "more" to the diamond he will buy at the chepest place he can.
The example Reiff gave is incorect, the fact that his cost of the stone was $24,575.00 is not contredicting that his competitor cost was much less, as probably Mr Reiff is buying like in the old fashion way and pays preimuem to his supplier and his competitor is using Rapnet and buying the same product at much cheper price.
The Diamond industry problem is diffrent.
the wholle industry is suffering from the lack of the miners in promoting "Natural Diamonds" to the public, (i would guess that Rolex publicity expenes is more than the wholle Diamond industry from miners to retails combeind.)
Without promoting Diaomnds, Diamonds will very soon lose their value in the eyes of the public as it is just an ilussion that you must maintain and repromote alawys.
the manufacteres problem is one: they are buying (or boghut) rough at more than economic value and this is for one reason, to get more finance from Indian Banks.
they can just conplain to themselevs, nobody is forcing you to buy rough diamonds, and if you are willing to pay highr price that the value of the end product it is you problem.
Problem of medium and small retailrs: Lack of branding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|