News

Advanced Search

British Hallmarking Council Ban Addresses 'Bonded Gold'

Apr 24, 2012 1:56 PM   By Jeff Miller
Comment Comment Email Email Print Print Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Share Share

RAPAPORT... The Birmingham Assay Office informed the trade of changes to how the U.K. will enforce gold hallmarking with  increases in ''bonded gold,''  gold-plated and rolled gold products coming to market. Bonded gold items are produced with a thick layer of gold alloy “bonded” on to a base metal or sterling silver core. The resulting article is only about 10 percent gold alloy by weight on average, but could be easily mistaken as an all-gold item by the consumer or the retailer.

Such products have been introduced from the United States where there are clear regulations for marking and describing them.  However, the descriptor bonded gold is not specifically permitted by the 1973 Hallmarking Act, which did not envisage the development of the process at the time it was drafted.

The British Hallmarking Council (BHC) worked with Trading Standards authorities to find the correct way to mark bonded gold items based upon the existing provisions covering rolled gold and plated gold in the 1973 Hallmarking Act, according to the Assay Office.

The BHC’s view was that no enforcement action should be taken in respect of the use of the term “bonded gold.”  The BHC further stipulated that, assuming the core is 925,  Sterling Silver, the article should carry a full SILVER hallmark, or a 925 stamp if it is under the Hallmarking exemption weight for silver of 7.78 grams.  Bonded gold on a base metal core cannot be hallmarked.

No standalone gold fineness marks will be permitted on bonded gold articles, because they are potentially confusing and misleading to U.K. consumers.  It is not permitted to mark the article ''9K,'' ''10K,'' ''14K,'' ''18K,'' etc., as is common practice in the U.S.  The only circumstance in which this is allowed is if the gold fineness is immediately preceded or followed by the words “Bonded Gold,” “Rolled Gold” or “Gold Plated.”  For example, an article with a silver hallmark (or 925 stamp on underweight articles) can be marked as follows: 925 & 18K bonded gold/rolled gold/gold plated.

It was also emphasized that the bonded gold layer must be of a fineness of at least 375 parts per thousand and of a recognized U.K. standard.  So, for example, bonded gold of apparently 10K can only be described as 9K.  This follows the practice for gold-plated and rolled gold articles in the U.K.

The guidance applies to all bonded gold, rolled gold and gold-plated silver articles below the 7.78 gram exemption weight for hallmarking, as well as for those requiring hallmarking.  The exemption is an exemption from hallmarking itself, not from the requirements of every other part of the Hallmarking Act 1973.

Christopher Jewitt, the newly appointed chairman of the BHC, said,  “Some of the bonded gold items we have seen had very confusing markings and the consumer could easily have believed them to be 9K gold throughout. The British Hallmarking Council supports Trading Standards and the Assay Offices in implementing and enforcing this important guidance to ensure that U.K. jewelers and consumers are protected from being misled.”

The full Guidance from the British Hallmarking Council can be found at www.bis.gov.uk/britishhallmarkingcouncil or on any of the four U.K. Assay Offices websites. http://www.theassayoffice.co.uk/bonded_gold.html .

Comment Comment Email Email Print Print Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Share Share
Tags: assay, british, gold, hallmarks, Jeff Miller, office, u.k.
Similar Articles
RockwellRockwell Diamonds Raises $4M
Nov 21, 2014
Rockwell Diamonds Inc. completed an offering of two-year unsecured convertible debentures...
Similar Videos
Growth Disparity Widens Among Industry's Top Securities
Jan 02, 2013
There seemed to be two stories emerging from diamond industry share...
Zales Store Zale's 4Q Sales +8%,... 1111 sm Diamond News Broadcast... Diamond News Broadcast...
Comments: (0)  Add comment Add Comment
Arrange Comments Last to First
© Copyright 1978-2014 by Martin Rapaport. All rights reserved. Index®, RapNet®, Rapaport®, PriceGrid™, Diamonds.Net™, and JNS®; are TradeMarks of Martin Rapaport.
While the information presented is from sources we believe reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or validity of any information presented by Rapaport or the views expressed by users of our internet service.