News

Advanced Search

Lack of Top-Quality Diamonds Hits Lucara

Aug 9, 2018 6:23 AM   By Rapaport News
Comment Comment Email Email Print Print Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Share Share


RAPAPORT... Lucara Diamond Corp.’s sales and profit fell in the second quarter amid lower-quality production from its Karowe mine and a drop in the average price.

Revenue declined 19% year on year to $64.5 million for the three months ending June 30, even as sales volume rose 26% to 75,329 carats, the company reported Wednesday. The average selling price slid 36% to $856 per carat. Profit slumped 39% to $19.7 million.

While Lucara recovered a higher quantity of large diamonds, the revenue drop reflected the absence of top-quality stones of the type the miner sold in the same period last year. Those included a 373.72-carat shard (pictured, right) — once part of the Lesedi La Rona — that fetched $17.5 million in May 2017.

Lucara recovered 253 special-size diamonds — over 10.8 carats — during the period, the highest number of specials it has recovered in a single quarter. Of those diamonds, 11 weighed over 100 carats, including three that exceeded 300 carats. Twelve stones sold for more than $1 million each.

The quarterly revenue excludes $3.9 million Lucara received in July for diamonds it sold in June.

The company also increased its resource estimate for the AK06 project at the south lobe of its Karowe asset in Botswana by 54%, from an earlier range of 4.4 million to 6.8 million carats. Lucara intends to shift its focus to the south lobe, where the miner has recovered larger and higher-value stones than those in the north or center lobes.

Lucara expects to produce between 270,000 and 290,000 carats this year, and has forecast revenue of $170 million to $200 million, in line with its previous outlook. Revenue for 2017 was $220.8 million, boosted by the $53 million sale of the Lesedi La Rona.

Image: Donald Woodrow
Tags: Karowe mine, Lesedi La Rona, lucara, Lucara Diamond Corp., Rapaport News, South Lobe
Similar Articles
Comments: (0)  Add comment Add Comment
Arrange Comments Last to First