Rapaport Magazine
Markets & Pricing

Antwerp

Industry seeks alternative credit sources

As banks back away from diamonds, can companies find adequate financing options?

By Marc Goldstein
The recent decisions by ADB/KBC, ABN-AMRO and Standard Chartered to leave the diamond business have made it clear that European banks don’t want to be involved in the industry anymore. With that, a number of prevailing illusions have been stripped away: that banks can keep lending money as long as the interest is paid, regardless of risk officers’ warnings that the borrowers can’t repay the loan (as reportedly occurred with Standard Chartered); that manufacturers can keep buying rough diamonds at higher prices than those of the polished stones they yield; that replacing inventory-based financing with turnover-based financing — i.e., requiring borrowers to show proofs of sale in order to get a loan, rather than relying on the stock they have as an indicator of what they can sell — will solve the problem. 
   The industry can’t regain capital unless it’s built on trust. One could draw a parallel between the diamond trade’s situation and the recent economic crisis in Greece. In Greece, at some point, trust in the system was so damaged that people were lining up at the banks to get their money back. In the diamond trade, the dynamic is the same — except it’s the banks that are lining up to claim their money.

Banking on newcomers
   In the meantime, there are some newcomers to the diamond-financing scene, even if their approach is somewhat different than that of the banks. One example is Channel Capital Advisors, a London-based credit asset manager authorized and regulated by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority. Channel has completed a series of financing arrangements with three leading diamantaires, and its partners include a panel of large non-bank institutional investors, bringing a diversity of both funding sources and loan deadlines to the sector. 
   One of the issues banks face in diamond-financing is the lag between the purchase of rough and the sale of the final polished product — in other words, between the time the borrowed money is spent and the time the borrower receives a sufficient return on the investment to pay back the loan. Non-bank sources are stepping up as an alternative source of funding — or working capital — for that period, known as “financing days.” 
   “Financing gaps are increasingly emerging in trade finance, working capital finance and SME financing across a number of industries,” said Channel CEO Walter Gontarek. “Banks are subject generally to greater capital requirements and are now adjusting their risk appetite, rationing credit allocation and increasing pricing. There is growing evidence of nearly zero growth [in new major banks entering the scene in Europe] for several years now across all corporate sectors.” 
   Though Channel hasn’t disclosed the total amount of financing it has provided, some have estimated that it has given its three clients a global sum of approximately $200 million to $250 million in credit.

A weak replacement? 
   Still, initiatives like these are unlikely to compensate for the billions of dollars folding away from the trade. Furthermore, as diamond banking specialist Pierre De Bosscher noted, “this is the kind of financing that will only mainly work for the top diamond companies. And this is for a very simple reason: In order to deliver attractive and workable interest rates to the diamond companies, the latter have to be extremely well-managed, [compliant with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)], and as such, transparent [if they want to receive] this kind of long-term financing. It’s the only way to reduce the risk [to] the lender and justify lower interest rates.”

Article from the Rapaport Magazine - October 2017. To subscribe click here.

Comment Comment Email Email Print Print Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Share Share