News

Advanced Search

There’s Life in Baselworld Yet

Mixed Reactions to Shorter, Sparser Watch and Jewelry Show

Mar 28, 2018 1:20 PM   By Anthony DeMarco
Comment Comment Email Email Print Print Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Share Share


RAPAPORT... Baselworld 2018, which ended Tuesday, saw a year-on-year decline from 1,300 exhibitors to approximately 650, and was shortened from eight days to six. Considering that the world’s largest watch and jewelry fair hosted 1,500 participants in 2016, this year’s drop seems even more dramatic. More defections are expected next year as contracts with exhibitors expire.

In a terse statement in November, Baselworld officials reiterated the defiant stance they took during the 2017 show: that they had decided to make it a leaner event by focusing on quality rather than quantity.

Yet did a leaner Baselworld deliver for exhibitors and buyers? It depends whom you ask. The larger brands — with their majestic three-story booths in hall 1 — would say the show was a success. But away from the crowds the results were mostly mixed.

Baselworld officials said there was an 8% increase in attendance during the first two days of the show, a figure those at the fair mistrusted. There were also rumors that there would be more adjustments to the Swiss show’s new format. The most interesting one is a change of date to align more closely with the Salon International de la Haute Horlogerie, held in Geneva in January, though the official Baselworld website already has the 2019 dates posted as March 21 to 26.

Whereas in previous years, exhibitors filled every corner of the massive, five-building Baselworld complex, this year the defectors’ absence was striking. Halls 4 and 5 were closed and halls 1 and 2 each lost a third of their exhibitor space. The jewelry exhibitors’ area in hall 2, where two floors of exhibition space were pared down to one, took the hardest hit.

One participant, a creator of one-of-a-kind pieces who requested anonymity, complained that a shorter festival meant less time with journalists, which is important for his business. The founder of a large US jewelry brand who attended as a visitor was shocked by the low number of jewelers in hall 2.

However, several exhibitors in Hall 2 were upbeat. Among them was Laura Bicego, head of Italian gold jewelry brand Nanis, who was hugging friends and customers as they came to visit.

“There were a lot of big new customers, a lot of traffic,” she said, noting that that first day was slow but all the days following were busy. “We were a bit worried at the beginning because of the reduction of exhibitors and big names, but we decided to come anyway, and we are very happy.”

Michael Hakimian, CEO of pearl brand Yoko London, insisted the fair was still a draw for the most important buyers.

“I will exhibit here for the next 25 years,” he said.

On the second floor of hall 1 (hall 1.1), where several big-name jewelers exhibited, Roberto Demeglio, founder of his eponymous high-design brand, remained devoted to the show, saying his long-term commitment would continue.

The largest watch and jewelry brands led the support for Baselworld, most notably at the annual press conference prior to the opening of Baselworld, where key officials from Rolex, Patek Philippe, Chopard and Tissot expressed their dedication to the fair.

The press conference was highly unusual not only because it brought brand representatives on stage, but it allowed them to promote their products. Baselworld officials also refused even to hint at the controversies surrounding the show, and refused to take questions from the press.

Welcome to the new Baselworld, still a work in progress.

Image: Patek Philippe
Comment Comment Email Email Print Print Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Share Share
Tags: Anthony DeMarco, basel, Baselworld, Rapaport News, shows, Switzerland, trade fairs, watches
Similar Articles
Comments: (0)  Add comment Add Comment
Arrange Comments Last to First
© Copyright 1978-2018 by Martin Rapaport. All rights reserved. Index®, RapNet®, Rapaport®, PriceGrid™, Diamonds.Net™, and JNS®; are TradeMarks of Martin Rapaport.
While the information presented is from sources we believe reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or validity of any information presented by Rapaport or the views expressed by users of our internet service.