News

Advanced Search

Let’s Talk About Conflict

Insights

Mar 4, 2021 3:35 AM   By Avi Krawitz
Comment Comment Email Email Print Print Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Share Share


RAPAPORT... The discussion surrounding conflict diamonds has evolved. Frustrated by the failure of the Kimberley Process (KP) to address today’s broader ethical challenges, the trade has developed several programs to compensate. Groups such as the Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) and private entities have systems in place to assure buyers that their diamonds can be fully accounted for, have done no harm and have, in fact, uplifted communities along the way.

The KP’s function should not be entirely dismissed, even if its mandate is limited to the 2003 definition of a conflict diamond: one that funds a rebel movement engaged in a civil war. Such occurrences are still a concern. Just last month, the World Diamond Council (WDC) — which represents the industry at the KP — urged diligence in handling rough from the Central African Republic (CAR), amid reports that its capital city of Bangui had come under fire from rebel fighters.

While less than 1% of global production is classified as conflict diamonds under the official definition, the industry cannot rest on its laurels. The Kimberley Process Civil Society Coalition launched a campaign in February claiming that tens of thousands of people from diamond-mining communities continue to live with conflict. The coalition has released an eight-minute video titled “We Need to Talk About Diamonds,” following the stories of three individuals who have suffered horrific abuses at mining sites. It is hosting a webinar on March 16 to further the discussion.

The KP does not consider human-rights abuses, child labor or poor working conditions, and it overlooks the actions of rogue governments and companies. It needs to broaden its definition of conflict diamonds to include those elements. Meanwhile, there is concern that the industry’s source-verification initiatives are creating a hierarchy — rewarding companies with the means to trace their diamonds, and leaving behind the many small businesses and vulnerable trade members that lack such resources.

We need to understand their plight better to effect positive change. We need to recognize those diamonds — and entities — that may yet tarnish our hard-won improved reputation. Let’s join the conversation at www.kpcivilsociety.org

This article was first published in the March 2021 issue of Rapaport Magazine.

Image: Artisanal mining in Sierra Leone. (Rapaport News)
Comment Comment Email Email Print Print Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Share Share
Tags: Avi Krawitz, Central African Republic, Conflict Diamonds, diamonds, Jewelry, Kimberley Process, KP Civil Society, Responsible Jewellery Council, World Diamond Council
Similar Articles
Rough diamond De BeersDe Beers Rough Sales Stabilize
Apr 07, 2021
De Beers brought in $440 million at its March rough sale, with the miner giving an optimistic outlook
Grib Diamonds 140Grib Sees Price Rise for Smaller Rough
Mar 24, 2021
Prices of smaller rough exceeded expectations at Grib Diamonds’ March sale, with demand rising for certain
Comments: (0)  Add comment Add Comment
Arrange Comments Last to First
© Copyright 1978-2021 by Rapaport USA Inc. All rights reserved. Index®, RapNet®, Rapaport®, PriceGrid™, Diamonds.Net™, and JNS®; are registered TradeMarks.
While the information presented is from sources we believe reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or validity of any information presented by Rapaport or the views expressed by users of our internet service.